Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42639024›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2026

LAFA: a framework for reproducible longitudinal assessment of protein function annotation models.

An Phan, Yanli Wang, Frimpong Boadu, Jianlin Cheng, Predrag Radivojac, Iddo Friedberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

An PhanProgram in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0154-076X
Yanli WangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7864-826X
Frimpong BoaduSoftware Engineering, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA 98052, United States.
Jianlin ChengDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0305-2853
Predrag RadivojacKhoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6769-0793
Iddo FriedbergDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Preventive Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1789-8000

Funding

Fine-grained Annotation of the Protein Universe through a Community of PracticeR01GM145937 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Iddo Friedberg · 2024 to 2026
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM145937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Protein function prediction is a challenging task and an open problem in computational biology. The Critical Assessment of protein Function Annotation (CAFA) is a triennial, community-driven initiative that provides an independent, large-scale evaluation of computational methods for protein function prediction through time-delayed benchmarking experiments. CAFA has played a key role in highlighting high-performing methodologies and fostering detailed analysis and exchange of ideas. However, outside the periodic CAFA challenges, there is no platform for the continuous evaluation of newly developed methods and tracking performance as function annotations accumulate. Results: Here we introduce the Longitudinal Assessment of Protein Function Annotation Models server (LAFA) as a persistent benchmarking system for protein function prediction methods. LAFA provides a continuous evaluation of containerized function prediction methods, enabling up-to-date and robust comparative assessment of method performance under evolving ground truth. LAFA accelerates methodological iteration, supports reproducibility, and offers a more dynamic and fine-grained view of progress in protein function prediction. Code and Data Availability: LAFA is available at https://functionbench.net/. Detailed evaluation results can be found at https://github.com/FriedbergLab/CAFA_forever.

Identifiers

PMID42639024
PMCPMC13501529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.