Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42638937›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

All you need is love: preliminary validation of a new test of 10 parenting competencies that predict good outcomes with young children.

Robert Epstein, Priyanka Nanayakkara, Amanda Newland, Ning Wang, Vanessa R Zankich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert EpsteinAmerican Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology, Vista, CA, United States.
Priyanka NanayakkaraAmerican Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology, Vista, CA, United States.
Amanda NewlandAmerican Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology, Vista, CA, United States.
Ning WangAmerican Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology, Vista, CA, United States.
Vanessa R ZankichAmerican Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology, Vista, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The main objectives of this study were to provide preliminary evidence of the validity of a new online test of parenting competencies and to determine the relative value of 10 competencies that have been shown in empirical studies to be helpful in parenting. Methods: We examined data obtained from a diverse convenience sample of 16,986 parents in 133 countries (53.3% from the U.S.) who completed the new online parenting questionnaire. We employed a concurrent study design to assess the validity of the new instrument. In a double-blind procedure to assess content validity, 11 parenting professionals rated both the competencies and the questionnaire items. To assess criterion validity, we used regression analyses to examine the relationship between questionnaire scores and participants' answers to questions about the quality of their relationship with their children, how highly they rated their own parenting ability, and the happiness, health, and success of their children. Results: Total scores were positively correlated with answers to our five criterion questions ( Conclusion: The study supports the view that parenting can be broken down into measurable and trainable competencies and provides guidance regarding how such training should be conducted.

Indexed as

EPCIEpstein Parenting Competencies Inventoryparenting competenciesparenting outcomesparenting skillstest validation

Identifiers

PMID42638937
PMCPMC13500332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.