Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42638922›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Do all adolescents benefit equally from school-based mental health interventions? A subgroup analysis by depression severity at 12 and 18 months follow-up.

Denis Duagi, Ben Carter, Steven Lisk, June S L Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Denis DuagiInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ben CarterInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Steven LiskInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
June S L BrownInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: School-based mental health interventions show modest effects in reducing depression symptoms. However, most trials report only average effects that may mask important differences across symptom severity levels, which are important in assessing long term risk, particularly as sub-threshold depression is a risk factor for clinical depression. Aims: This study examined whether the effects of DISCOVER, a brief CBT-based self-referral workshop for adolescents, at 12- and 18-month follow-ups differed according to participants' baseline depression severity (clinical, subthreshold, or normal range). Methods: This is an exploratory secondary analysis of the BESST cluster randomised controlled trial involving 900 adolescents from 57 UK schools randomised to DISCOVER or treatment-as-usual (TAU). Participants were categorised by baseline depression severity using established Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ) cut-offs: clinical (>27), subthreshold (17-27), or normal (<17). We conducted multilevel mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression to examine transitions between severity categories and mixed-effects linear models for continuous outcomes (depression, anxiety, wellbeing, sleep quality, resilience) for each severity group. Results: Among adolescents with clinical-level depression at baseline (DISCOVER n=142, TAU n=172), DISCOVER significantly increased the odds of achieving normal-range symptoms at 12 months (RRR = 3.12, 95% CI: 1.48-15.97, p=0.006) and 18 months (RRR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.11-6.24, p=0.029). Small-to-moderate effects were maintained for depression (d=0.44 at 12 months, d=0.30 at 18 months) and anxiety (d=0.38 at 12 months, d=0.30 at 18 months). For adolescents with subthreshold depression symptoms at baseline (DISCOVER n=170, TAU n=157), DISCOVER did not show benefits on depression but demonstrated specific anxiety benefits at 12 months (d=0.34, p=0.004). Conclusions: DISCOVER produces small to moderate sustained benefits for adolescents with clinical-level depression, with effects maintained through critical post-school transitions. The intervention shows more limited benefits for those with subthreshold symptoms, achieving specific anxiety reduction but not broader improvement. These findings suggest that self-referral school-based interventions are effective over the longer term for adolescents with clinical-level symptoms, while highlighting the need for tailored approaches for subthreshold presentations.

Indexed as

anxietyCBTdepressionschool-based interventionsyouth mental health

Identifiers

PMID42638922
PMCPMC13501227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.