Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42638891›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

The patient as teacher: a four-phase blueprint for institutional change.

Lucas Wollmann, Axel Wolf, Lara Cooke, Maria Santana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucas WollmannDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Axel WolfCentre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lara CookeDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Maria SantanaDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Over recent decades, patient involvement in medical education has shifted from passive case demonstrations toward active partnerships in teaching, assessment, and curriculum design, a transition that must recognize patients and relatives as persons with experiential knowledge, not merely as educational instruments. This perspective article argues that accumulated evidence now justifies a deliberate shift from scattered, champion-driven initiatives to embedded institutional strategy. Evidence and gaps: The evidence supports meaningful benefits across stakeholders: learners develop stronger clinical reasoning, communication skills, and empathy; patient educators report empowerment and enhanced self-esteem; and institutions advance their social accountability mission. However, the field continues to struggle with inconsistent terminology, fragmented implementation, short-term satisfaction-based outcomes, underexplored ethical considerations, and weak institutional commitment. Proposed roadmap: To address these gaps, we propose a four-phase implementation roadmap. Phase 1 (Institutional Diagnosis) maps current practices against Towle et al.'s six-level taxonomy and establishes an institutional position statement. Phase 2 (Role Definition and Phased Goal-Setting) advocates stepwise progression, typically starting at Levels 3-4, where patients share experiences or act as trained teachers, advancing toward full curriculum governance partnership. Phase 3 (Implementation Planning and Capacity Building) addresses curriculum integration, resource allocation, faculty development, and community partnerships. Phase 4 (Outcomes Monitoring and Evaluation) calls for multilevel, longitudinal evaluation frameworks, including systematic assessment of patient educators' experiences. Discussion: We present this roadmap as an evidence-informed conceptual synthesis whose implementation depends on continued institutional commitment. Cross-cutting principles include incrementalism, sustained institutional commitment, patient co-production, representative recruitment, and rigorous longitudinal research.

Indexed as

health profession educationimplementation scienceinstitutional changepatient-centered carepatient educatorpatient involvementsocial accountability

Identifiers

PMID42638891
PMCPMC13500306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.