ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Affective pathways in human-AI interaction: the formation of willingness to communicate among Chinese KFL learners in AI-mediated informal digital learning of Korean.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines willingness to communicate (WTC) among Chinese learners of Korean in the context of AI-mediated informal digital learning of Korean (AI-IDLK) from an affective perspective. Moving beyond the assumption that L2 confidence and anxiety function as parallel affective predictors, the study suggests that these variables are related to WTC in different ways in contexts of human-AI interaction. Using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, this study collected survey data from 205 Chinese KFL learners and analyzed them using SPSS 27.0 and the PROCESS Macro, including descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, reliability testing, Pearson correlation analysis, hierarchical multiple regression, and mediation analysis. Interview data from nine participants were examined through NVivo-supported reflexive thematic analysis. The quantitative results show that AI-IDLK is positively associated with WTC, with confidence showing the only significant indirect association, while anxiety does not exhibit a significant indirect effect. Qualitative findings further help explain these results by showing that confidence is associated with Psychological safety, Repetitive production practice, Personalized adaptive learning, Sustainable accessibility, and Discourse agency and engagement, whereas anxiety persists in relation to Uncertainty of AI responses, Uncontrollability of interaction, Uncritical praise, and the Gap with real interaction. Taken together, these findings suggest that the affective foundation of WTC in AI-IDLK may not be fully explained by the conventional view of confidence and anxiety as parallel affective predictors, and they call for a refinement of WTC theory that more explicitly accounts for the affective conditions of human-AI interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.