Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42638827›Full record

ArticleSage open aging

The Life Story Book Experience With Residents With Neurocognitive Disorders in Long-Term Care and Their Caregivers: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Marie-Soleil Hardy, Camille Savoie, Maude Laberge, Chaimaa Fanaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sage open aging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marie-Soleil HardyFaculty of Nursing Science, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1485-9361
Camille SavoieFaculty of Nursing Science, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8198-2653
Maude LabergeDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1274-136X
Chaimaa FanakiFaculty of Nursing Science, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9285-1344

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Residents with neurocognitive disorders in long-term care facilities experience behavioral and psychological symptoms that affect well-being and relationships. Life story books, personalized compilations of memories, may enhance communication and emotional connection through reminiscence. Objectives: To examine observed changes in the effects and acceptability of the life story books intervention among residents with neurocognitive disorders and their informal caregivers. Methods: A convergent mixed-methods design was conducted in three long-term care facilities with sixteen resident-caregiver dyads. Quantitative data were collected before and after a six-month intervention, complemented by qualitative interviews and observations. Results: Fifteen residents and eleven caregivers completed the study. Quantitative findings revealed changes in positive affect and pleasure, as well as reduced agitated behaviors and an increase in irritability. Qualitative findings highlighted enhanced engagement, communication, and emotional connection. Caregivers reported high acceptability and confidence in using the books, despite occasional emotional ambivalence. Conclusion: Life Story Book is a feasible and person-centred intervention that shows promise in promoting emotional well-being and meaningful connections in the context of dementia care.

Indexed as

life story booklong-term careneurocognitive disordersperson-centred care

Identifiers

PMID42638827
PMCPMC13500964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.