ArticleFrontiers in tuberculosis2025
Country-level heterogeneity in MDR-TB drug susceptibility supports country-specific policy development.
Article in Frontiers in tuberculosis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The global challenge of tuberculosis (TB) is exacerbated by multidrug-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB), confounded by country-level differences in TB prevention and care. The impact of local differences in drug-resistance selection pressure and transmission may be observed by analyzing distributions of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Using the Bedaquiline Drug-Resistance Emergence Assessment in MDR-TB (DREAM) dataset, we analyzed MIC distributions derived from a standard protocol across 11 countries and 12 antibiotics to explore country-level variation in drug susceptibility. Methods: We analyzed 71,135 MICs from 5,928 MDR/RR-TB isolates sampled from bedaquiline-naive patients. We compared MIC distributions across countries and WHO resistance classes, then used Spearman rank correlations to compare the drug-susceptibility within individual isolates by country. To explore the effect of bedaquiline use on resistance, we used linear regression to compare bedaquiline MICs with WHO data on bedaquiline usage. Results: MIC distributions between countries were heterogeneous, especially for fluoroquinolones and isoniazid. The correlation analysis revealed a relationship between bedaquiline and clofazimine MICs in six countries. Analysis of isolates by resistance class demonstrated that XDR-TB isolates had higher MICs than MDR-TB isolates for antibiotics not part of the XDR definition. We found limited evidence to suggest that past bedaquiline usage at the national level led to raised bedaquiline MICs in patients not exposed to the drug. Conclusions: Our research shows clear variations in drug susceptibility within
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.