ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Generative AI as a cognitive co-learner: a developmental framework for AI literacy in health sciences education.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI), especially large language models, is playing an expanding role in shaping learning within health sciences education. Current discussions often focus on efficiency or academic integrity, with less attention to how learners engage with AI across evolving cognitive and developmental stages. This Perspective conceptualizes generative AI as a cognitive co-learner, an interactive system that supports idea generation, organization, and reasoning while requiring human oversight for validation and interpretation. We propose a developmental framework for AI literacy that describes stage-typical patterns of AI engagement across educational contexts characterized by differing cognitive and epistemic demands. The proposed progression from exploration to synthesis to calibration reflects changes in the functional role of AI, learner cognitive engagement, and trust in AI-generated outputs. This progression is intended as a theoretical proposition rather than an empirically validated development trajectory. Central to this framework is calibrated trust, defined as the alignment between confidence in AI outputs and their actual reliability. Across all stages, human judgment, critical evaluation, and metacognitive awareness remain essential. This Perspective highlights the need for stage-appropriate educational strategies and learning activities that support responsible AI use while strengthening health sciences education and maintaining the primacy of human cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.