Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42638745›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Generative AI as a cognitive co-learner: a developmental framework for AI literacy in health sciences education.

Myo Zin Oo, Soe Sandi Tint, Kyi Phyu Myo Khaing, Thanakit Noithanom, Ammar Almurisi Bin Abdul Hamid, Myo Khaing Oo, Hlaing Thaw Dar, Rattanathorn Intarak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Myo Zin OoResearch Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Soe Sandi TintGlobal Health and Chronic Conditions Research Center, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Kyi Phyu Myo KhaingUnity Concord International School, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Thanakit NoithanomFaculty of Public Health, St Teresa International University, Nakhon Nayok, Thailand.
Ammar Almurisi Bin Abdul HamidSchool of Medicine, IMU, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Myo Khaing OoIndependent Researcher, Yangon, Myanmar.
Hlaing Thaw DarPublic Health and Community Medicine Department, School of Medicine, IMU, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Rattanathorn IntarakFaculty of Public Health, St Teresa International University, Nakhon Nayok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI), especially large language models, is playing an expanding role in shaping learning within health sciences education. Current discussions often focus on efficiency or academic integrity, with less attention to how learners engage with AI across evolving cognitive and developmental stages. This Perspective conceptualizes generative AI as a cognitive co-learner, an interactive system that supports idea generation, organization, and reasoning while requiring human oversight for validation and interpretation. We propose a developmental framework for AI literacy that describes stage-typical patterns of AI engagement across educational contexts characterized by differing cognitive and epistemic demands. The proposed progression from exploration to synthesis to calibration reflects changes in the functional role of AI, learner cognitive engagement, and trust in AI-generated outputs. This progression is intended as a theoretical proposition rather than an empirically validated development trajectory. Central to this framework is calibrated trust, defined as the alignment between confidence in AI outputs and their actual reliability. Across all stages, human judgment, critical evaluation, and metacognitive awareness remain essential. This Perspective highlights the need for stage-appropriate educational strategies and learning activities that support responsible AI use while strengthening health sciences education and maintaining the primacy of human cognition.

Indexed as

AI literacycalibrated trustcognitive co-learnergenerative artificial intelligencehealth sciences education

Identifiers

PMID42638745
PMCPMC13500622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.