ArticleFrontiers in tuberculosis2026
Readiness assessment as a strategy, not an afterthought: leveraging implementation science to integrate tuberculosis comorbidity care in Pakistan's health system.
Article in Frontiers in tuberculosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health facility readiness assessment is a foundational element in designing and implementing integrated tuberculosis (TB) and comorbidity interventions, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Pakistan. The integration of TB care with management of comorbid conditions like diabetes mellitus, depression, and tobacco use is complicated and challenged by diverse, multifaceted barriers at the health system, organizational, and individual levels. Evidence-based frameworks, such as Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework, and related tools, help researchers to systematically evaluate service system capacity for service delivery, determine operational gaps and shortcomings, and understand socio-cultural and infrastructural constraints. This ensures that subsequent interventions are not only scientifically grounded but also tailored and well-suited to local capacities, thereby enhancing the sustainability and overall effectiveness of integration. In this perspective paper, we argue that readiness assessment should be institutionalized that is, formally embedded within service delivery structure, routine policy, planning, and decision-making processes, as a strategic prerequisite for integrating tuberculosis and comorbidity care, and we highlight how implementation science frameworks can support context-sensitive planning and scale-up in Pakistan and other similar health system settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.