ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Molecular determinants of differential substrate selection between the Src family kinases Lck and Src.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Src family kinases (SFKs) share highly conserved catalytic domains yet display distinct biological functions, raising the question of how substrate specificity is achieved. Here, we investigate the basis of differential ITAM recognition by Lck and Src, using complementary cellular and computational approaches. In-cell assays demonstrated that, contrary to Lck, Src was completely incapable of phosphorylating the TCR ITAMs when ectopically expressed in a T cell environment. Domain-swapping experiments further revealed that substitution of the Src kinase domain with that of Lck was sufficient to confer ITAM phosphorylation and trigger downstream TCR signaling responses, whereas exchange of adaptor domains had minimal effect. To gain structural insight into this selectivity, molecular dynamics simulations followed by ensemble docking were performed using conformations sampled from simulations of the Lck and Src kinase domains together with an ITAM peptide. The analyses revealed that Lck consistently accommodates the ITAM peptide with higher shape complementarity than Src, supporting a more favorable structural environment for ITAM recognition. Our findings demonstrate that subtle differences within the kinase domain of closely related SFKs can profoundly influence substrate recognition, with significant consequences for signaling responses in living cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.