ArticleFrontiers in tuberculosis2025
Optimizing use of data and evidence-related tools to complement routine surveillance systems for tuberculosis program planning.
Article in Frontiers in tuberculosis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Challenges and gaps with routine tuberculosis (TB) data and surveillance systems are well-known. To address them, numerous TB data and evidence-related tools (e.g. surveys, assessments) have been developed to help countries collect, analyze, and use TB-related data. The "TB Data Optimization Project" aimed to assess the use and usefulness of these tools and propose best practices. Methods: Phase one of this mixed-methods project included structured key informant interviews (KIIs) with TB data experts, literature review, and mapping tools' indicators and metrics. Phase two consisted of case studies in five countries (Ethiopia, Kenya, Pakistan, Uganda, and Vietnam). Structured KIIs and a use case discussion were conducted with TB program staff and partners in each country, and TB-related documents were reviewed. Phase three was an online survey for national TB programs. Qualitative data were recorded, transcribed, coded, and inductively analyzed. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively. Findings were triangulated and summarized into key themes. Results: Seventy-two KIIs were conducted, 42 countries completed surveys, and 212 documents were reviewed. Six key themes emerged: usefulness, opportunities and challenges with planning and implementation, technical assistance and financial support, timing and coordination, motivating factors for implementation, and the role of tools in relation to routine data systems. The tools provide critical information and most were considered worth the investment. Challenges include suboptimal implementation of the recommendations from the tools, poor timing and coordination of implementation, and insufficient capacity building. A set of best practices was developed. Conclusion: While the long-term goal is to strengthen and integrate routine data systems, TB data tools currently play an important role in filling gaps. Findings from this project provide considerations for optimal use of TB data tools; however, there is still need for further guidance on selecting the most critical tools to fill gaps during TB programmatic and strategic planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.