ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
"With a husband like that, I'd be happy to have three kids": ideal fatherhood, endogenous symbolic annihilation of motherhood, and fertility intentions on Chinese social media.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chinese social media has become an important arena where fatherhood is made visible as a form of coparenting. In the context of demographic transition, Confucian gender norms, and rising feminist consciousness, short videos of fathers caring for children often attract public praise. Yet within fatherhood-centered comment threads, such praise often positions maternal labor as an assumed background rather than an equally recognized form of care work. Existing research has examined platform content and fatherhood discourse, but less is known about how everyday user interaction reshapes the value hierarchy of paternal and maternal labor. Methods: This study analyzes 2,798 valid public comments collected from Xiaohongshu using the keyword "daddy raising kids." It combines thematic analysis, critical discourse analysis (CDA), and symbolic annihilation theory to examine the implicit biases and social meanings embedded in these discursive practices. Results: The analysis identifies four main themes. First, users construct the "ideal father" by spectacularizing male caregiving and positioning maternal labor as an assumed background rather than an equally recognized form of care work. Second, fatherhood is given performative and commercial value, while motherhood is often positioned as less visible and more naturalized. Third, women's "conscious resistance" coexists with "compliant discourse" that reaffirms traditional gender roles. Fourth, conditional fertility intentions show how motherhood is repeatedly invoked within fatherhood-centered discussions as a background reference through which paternal involvement, maternal labor, and reproductive responsibility are evaluated. Conclusion: This study suggests that the visibility of fatherhood on social media is shaped by platform logics, algorithmic amplification, and user interaction. It introduces the concept of "endogenous symbolic annihilation" to explain how everyday praise, comparison, silence, and compliance in user interaction may reproduce a gendered hierarchy in which paternal involvement becomes exceptional, while maternal labor and reproductive experiences remain less explicitly valued. This extends symbolic annihilation from media representation to participatory digital interaction. It also contributes to debates on fathers as coparents by showing that the celebration of paternal involvement does not necessarily produce coparenting equity. In the Chinese context, it may reproduce a gendered hierarchy in which fatherhood is valued as exceptional, while motherhood remains naturalized as obligation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.