ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Risk perception and spatial mobility on the Camino de Santiago: travel patterns analysis and the choice of Jacobean routes.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines how fear of crime and perceived risk influence spatial mobility strategies in natural environments. Drawing on environmental criminology and fear-of-crime research, the article analyses how sociodemographic characteristics, prior knowledge of crime, and perceptions of safety shape route choices and walking behaviour among pilgrims on the Camino de Santiago. The study is based on a survey of 1,080 pilgrims who completed an online questionnaire about perceived safety, knowledge of crime, and preferences for different types of routes. Associations between variables were analysed using contingency coefficients and multiple correspondence analysis to identify underlying behavioural patterns. The results reveal clear differences in spatial behaviour linked to gender, age, and perceived vulnerability. Women and younger pilgrims show a stronger preference for walking accompanied and for routes with higher social presence, while men and older participants are more likely to select solitary or highly natural routes and to walk alone. Perceptions of risk and prior knowledge of crime also influence these mobility strategies. The findings highlight the importance of subjective perceptions of safety in shaping the use of natural environments and extend fear-of-crime research beyond urban settings. The study contributes to environmental criminology by showing how perceived risk structures spatial behaviour in large-scale natural routes, with implications for the design, management and safety of recreational and pilgrimage pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.