ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Surgical, pathological, and microbiological characterization of cutaneous keloid fibroma in the thigh region of dromedary camels (
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to investigate the clinical, microbiological, and histopathological characteristics of cutaneous keloid fibroma and to evaluate the efficacy of surgical management in camels. Methods: Nine dromedary camels of various breeds (five Asfar, two Shageh, one Wadeh, and one Mejhem) presented with cutaneous fibrous masses located at the caudal aspect of the thigh region. All cases underwent detailed clinical assessment followed by microbiological and histopathological analyses. Results: Clinically, lesions were characterized by firm, well-demarcated, and slowly progressive masses; all cases (9/9) were non-painful on palpation, while restricted mobility and functional impairment were observed in a subset of cases (noted in larger or strategically located lesions). Microbiological examination revealed Conclusion: Clinical and histopathological evaluations are essential and sufficient for accurate diagnosis, whereas microbiological findings support identification of secondary infection but are not indispensable for diagnosis. Surgical excision remains the treatment of choice, providing favorable clinical outcomes and restoration of function, with consistent terminology aligned with the reported results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.