ArticleFrontiers in tuberculosis2025
Predicting treatment adherence in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis: insights from socioeconomic, demographic, and clinical factors of patients in the rural Eastern Cape.
Article in Frontiers in tuberculosis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Retrospective Analysis Examining the Impact of Educational Attainment and Social Determinants of Health on Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Predictors of Treatment Outcomes Among HIV-Positive Patients with Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Rural Eastern Cape, South Africa: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) poses a serious challenge to global health. Patients must follow complex medication regimens over long periods, and any failure to comply with these treatment plans can result in treatment failure, higher mortality rates, and an increased risk of developing additional drug resistance. Setting: The study was conducted in the rural Eastern Cape. Aim: This study aims to identify the key factors influencing treatment adherence among patients with DR-TB. Furthermore, it rigorously evaluates the predictive accuracy of machine learning models in assessing treatment adherence, with a strong focus on socioeconomic, demographic, and clinical factors. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with DR-TB. Data were collected from medical records. Four different models were developed and tested to evaluate their effectiveness in predicting treatment adherence: Random Forest, Logistic regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Gradient Boosting. Results: The Random Forest model achieved an accuracy of 53.3% in predicting treatment adherence. An analysis of feature importance indicated that age, income, education, social history, patient category, and comorbidities were the most significant factors influencing adherence. Patients with higher incomes, higher levels of education, and fewer comorbidities were more likely to follow their treatment plans. Conclusion: Adhering to treatment for DR-TB involves a range of socioeconomic and clinical factors. Income, education level, and pre-existing health conditions significantly influence how well patients follow their prescribed treatment regimens. Understanding these influences is crucial for enhancing treatment outcomes and facilitating patients' journey toward improved health. Contribution: These findings suggest that machine-learning models, especially Random Forest algorithms, can effectively support clinical decision-making by identifying patients at risk of non-adherence to their treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.