ArticleFrontiers in tuberculosis2025
Targeted transcriptomic analyses of tuberculosis treatment response and outcomes in The Gambia.
Article in Frontiers in tuberculosis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite availability of effective treatment regimens for drug-susceptible Tuberculosis (TB), some patients still experience poor treatment outcomes. Currently tools for monitoring treatment outcomes are dependent on detection of mycobacteria in sputum, which are slow, expensive and poor at predicting relapse and failure. This study aims to identify new blood-derived markers for predicting treatment response and outcomes. Methods: Whole blood was collected in PAXgene tubes from patients with microbiologically confirmed TB at diagnosis, week 2, and at months 2, 4, and 6. Treatment response and outcomes were determined by culture and gene expression was compared between slow and fast responders; and between patients with good (cured) and poor treatment outcomes (failure and recurrent TB) using targeted RNA gene expression. Gene signatures were developed using random forest classification models. Results: Significant changes in gene expression were detected over the course of the TB treatment. Notably, major gene expression differences were observed at diagnosis between subsequently cured patients and patients who experienced poor treatment outcomes while minimal changes were detected between slow and fast responders among cured patients at diagnosis. A 7-gene end of treatment signature distinguished patients with good outcomes from those with poor treatment outcomes with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.99), 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-0.99), and 1.0 (95% CI 0.99-1.00), at baseline, month 2 and 6, respectively. Additionally, a 6-gene month 2 signature discriminates slow from fast responders with AUCs of 0.49 (95% CI 0.33-0.64), 0.58 (95% CI 0.07-1.00), and 0.93 (95% CI 0.78-1.00) at diagnosis, week 2 and month 2, respectively. Conclusion: The study identified genes signatures associated with TB treatment response and outcomes suggesting potential utility for treatment monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.