ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2026
Incorporating community assembly mechanisms in biotic indices improves index performance.
Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Incorporating community assembly mechanisms in biotic indices improves index performance.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Macroinvertebrate biotic indices are widely used in the assessment of freshwater systems. One criticism of these indices is that they typically neglect assembly processes such as dispersal and species interactions. These assembly processes can influence community composition, leading to communities that are unrepresentative of local ecological conditions. Combining multiple water quality, macroinvertebrate community, and dispersal-related trait datasets, we built two stressor-specific (total nitrogen, total phosphorus) biotic indices for the south-central United States. From there, we quantified dispersal capacity, interspecific interactions, and niche breadth for each taxon present. These assembly mechanisms were then incorporated into each index, downweighing taxa that were high dispersers, high interactors, and/or exhibited a wide niche breadth. Initial and corrected indices were then tested and compared based on their continuous predictive performance and discriminative ability between nutrient levels. Our results show that indices with corrections for assembly mechanisms outperformed indices without corrections. These assembly mechanism corrections were then applied to the Salt Belt Index (SBI), a biotic index developed to measure salt intrusion in streams. Corrections also improved SBI performance, and specific corrections were identified that improved all three indices. Given their ubiquity in freshwater assessment, biotic indices should incorporate additional assembly mechanisms to more accurately reflect local conditions and improve index performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.