ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026
Prospective estimation of water equivalent diameter and SSDE using 3D landmark CT scans.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background3D Landmark (3DLM) scans have recently been introduced in some new CT scanners for automatic scan planning instead of paired 2D localizers, with potential additional utility. PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to measure the accuracy and precision of 3DLM scans for determining water equivalent diameter (
methodsA cohort of 223 diagnostic CT series comprised of 82 Head [52 non-contrast (NC); 30 contrast-enhanced (CE)], 66 Chest (36 NC; 30 CE), and 75 Abdomen-pelvis (45 NC; 30 CE) series, acquired on a CT scanner equipped with 3DLM capabilities, were retrospectively collected. All series were acquired for patient standard-of-care, and 3DLM series were generated according to the manufacturer's default protocol.
resultsThe mean [range] patient age was 45.9 years old [0.1-91.5]. The range of
conclusion3DLM-based measurements of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.