Observational studyNursing in critical care2026
Clinical Frailty in Intensive Care Units: Prevalence and Associated Factors.
Observational study in Nursing in critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFrailty is a syndrome characterised by increased sensitivity to stress alongside a reduction in an individual's biopsychosocial reserves. In intensive care patients, frailty is a significant condition that affects mortality and morbidity. However, routine frailty screening and its integration into care plans in intensive care units (ICUs) have not been standardised.
aimThe study aimed to determine the prevalence of frailty in patients hospitalised in an ICU in Türkiye and to examine the factors associated with frailty.
methodsThis prospective, observational study was conducted among patients hospitalised in the Anesthesia and Reanimation and General ICUs of a tertiary healthcare facility in Türkiye between January 1 and April 1, 2025. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II), Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS)-2002, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Body Mass Index (BMI), functional status and sociodemographic data were also recorded. Data were collected through interviews with patients or their legal guardians and through file records. Analyses were conducted using descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests, correlation coefficients and logistic regression.
resultsIn total, 149 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 69.9 ± 15.9 years, and 32.2% were aged ≥ 80 years. According to the CFS, the prevalence of frailty was 82.6%. Frailty was significantly associated with older age, male sex, low BMI, NRS-2002, functional decline, high APACHE II score, prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation and mortality (p < 0.05). The duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly longer in frail patients. Death from the ICU was significantly higher in frail patients. In logistic regression analysis, age (OR = 1.03, 95% CI, 1.00-1.06), male sex (OR = 2.96, 95% CI, 1.09-8.07), APACHE II (OR = 1.11, 95% CI, 1.03-1.19) and NRS-2002 (OR = 2.09, 95% CI, 1.06-4.09) were found to be independent predictors of frailty.
conclusionFrailty was highly prevalent among ICU patients and was significantly associated with several clinical and demographic factors negatively affecting prognosis, including prolonged mechanical ventilation and increased ICU mortality. Results suggest that routinely assessing frailty and integrating it into nursing care is critical for preventing complications and improving patient outcomes. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study suggests that early, systematic frailty screening in ICUs will contribute to the identification of at-risk patients and the development of individualised nursing care plans. Intensified nursing monitoring is recommended, particularly for patients with advanced age, male sex, low BMI and nutritional risk. Using frailty assessments in conjunction with traditional scores such as the APACHE II will enhance the prediction of mortality risk and improve patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.