ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026
How bone mis-segmentation affects MRI-based sCT dosimetry in head and neck radiotherapy: A CT-referenced study.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used for head-and-neck (H&N) delineation in radiotherapy (RT) owing to the lack of contrast in computed tomography (CT) images. MRI-based dosimetry is not yet fully developed for the H&N area due to the inter-patient variability and the difficulty of accurately quantifying cortical bone based on MRI measure. PURPOSE: Despite the difficulty of cortical bone segmentation with nearby air area, most papers in the literature show dosimetry results very close to the reference CT scan dosimetry. This study evaluated the impact of bone segmentation on dosimetry.
methodsA home-made phantom was used to evaluate the Hounsfield unit (HU) values of different tissue at diverse scanner energies. Different dosimetry plans were considered and compared with the reference CT-based RT plan used for the treatment: CT images with cortical bone voxels assigned to the density of water and three based on MR images using a density assignment (DA) method for synthetic CT (sCT) generation with various bone attribution. Images from 24 patients were compared using mean absolute error (MAE). The generated dosimetry parameters were compared on the basis of dose-volume histogram values and 3%/3 mm gamma pass rates.
resultsAmong the sCT, the best MAE were found for the DA sCT without bone. The mean of the median dose difference for the planning tumor volume (PTV) was less than 2% for all sCT. Mean gamma pass rate for the MR-based sCTs were comparable.
conclusionsThe DA of the bone can be of interest if correctly segmented, but in the absence of certainty, an overestimation will lead to significant errors while an underestimation gives results close to the reference. The relevance of very precise sCT can be questioned if it requires too many resources and overlooks patients with artifacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.