ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2026
Examining the Characteristics of Adolescents Recruited to a Novel Digital Treatment for Eating Disorders: Baseline Assessment in an Open Feasibility Trial.
Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Digital interventions for eating disorders have the potential to increase access to care and broaden the range of treatment options for adolescents. However, little is known about the characteristics of those who seek these interventions. Identifying such characteristics will help ensure that these interventions meet the needs of the target population, highlight potentially underrepresented groups, and support clinicians in assessing clinical suitability for individual patients. Objective: This study aimed to examine the characteristics of adolescents seeking digital treatment for eating disorders within routine clinical care and to explore whether the key components of the novel digital treatment align with the characteristics of the adolescents it is designed to support. Methods: This study used baseline data from an open feasibility trial of a novel digital treatment for eating disorders within routine clinical care. Participants were adolescents aged 15 to 18 years with a diagnosis of atypical anorexia nervosa, atypical bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, or eating disorder, unspecified. Baseline assessment included demographic characteristics, eating disorder symptomatology, psychosocial impairment, emotional dysregulation, anxiety, depression, negative self-evaluation, and motivational factors. Results: A total of 25 adolescents participated in the study, all of whom were women. The mean age was 16 (SD 0.87) years. Half of the adolescents had previously received face-to-face treatment for an eating disorder. The sample was transdiagnostic with some variation in distribution. The adolescents reported severe eating disorder symptoms, marked psychosocial impairment, emotional difficulties, elevated negative self-evaluation, and high levels of internal pretreatment motivation. Conclusions: The findings from this study underscore the relevance of digital interventions to complement or extend traditional eating disorder care for adolescents. This study emphasizes the importance of designing digital treatments that are sensitive to normative biases, address the multifaceted nature of eating disorders, and are tailored to the needs and preferences of a transdiagnostic population. The present findings are important insofar as they may inform whether the key treatment components align with the characteristics of adolescents seeking digital treatment for eating disorders within routine clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.