Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42638215›Full record

ArticleNursing in critical care2026

How Nurses Maintain High-Risk Medication Safety in Paediatric Intensive Care.

Meng Huang, Meng Lv, Jiayu Huang, Yan Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing in critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meng HuangSchool of Nursing, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5251-3058
Meng LvSchool of Nursing, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8823-1197
Jiayu HuangSchool of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4125-6059
Yan LinSchool of Nursing, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3612-6380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExisting research has focused mainly on high-risk medication errors, contributory factors and process-based interventions; less is known about nurses' everyday safety work in paediatric intensive care.

aimTo explore how nurses maintain high-risk medication safety in paediatric intensive care. STUDY

designA descriptive qualitative study using purposive sampling, critical incident interviews and inductive content analysis at a tertiary children's hospital in China.

resultsTen nurses participated. Four themes were generated: anomaly recognition and proactive verification; team communication and continued follow-up after risk identification; safety checks and bedside adaptations in medication practice; and learning from near misses and adjusting future practice. Together, these practices spanned order review, preparation, administration, pump and compatibility management, monitoring and team learning.

conclusionsExperienced nurses in paediatric intensive care maintained high-risk medication safety through linked practices of anomaly recognition, proactive verification, team communication, continued follow-up, safety checks, bedside adaptation and near-miss learning. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Training and workflow support should strengthen anomaly recognition, dose and infusion-rate recalculation, communication, active double checking, compatibility checking, infusion-pump management, follow-up monitoring and near-miss learning.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, PediatricMedication ErrorsPatient SafetyPediatric NursingChinaFemaleHumansQualitative Researchhigh‐risk medicationmedication safetynursespaediatric intensive carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID42638215
PMCPMC13504071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.