ArticleClinical transplantation2026
HLA-A, -B, and DR Mismatch and Outcomes After Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation in the Modern Era.
Article in Clinical transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- HLA-A, -B, and DR Mismatch and Outcomes After Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation in the Modern Era.Clinical transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHLA mismatch is known to impact post-transplant outcomes following kidney-alone transplantation. However, the impact on kidney outcomes in the context of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the impact of HLA mismatch on SPK outcomes.
methodAdult SPK recipients in the UNOS STAR registry (2010-2023) were analysed. Re-transplants were excluded. Multivariable nonlinear regression models evaluated the impact of HLA mismatch on outcome.
resultsIn a cohort of 10,559 SPK recipients overall mismatch was frequent, with only 34 recipients (0.3%) having 0/0/0 mismatches across HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR. HLA-DR mismatch was not associated with pancreas or kidney graft survival at 5 years; two versus zero HLA-DR mismatches aHR = 1.015 (95% CI 0.828-1.243) for pancreas graft survival, and aHR = 0.946 (0.753-1.188) for kidney graft survival. HLA-DR mismatch was also not associated with pancreas or kidney acute rejection or 12-month eGFR. HLA-A and HLA-B mismatches also showed no association with any pancreas or kidney transplant outcomes. Three-way interaction analyses between HLA-A, B and DR demonstrated no evidence that mismatch at any locus affected outcomes, irrespective of mismatch level at the other loci.
conclusionIn first-time simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation, donor-recipient HLA mismatch was not associated with pancreas or kidney graft survival, rejection, or early renal function. These findings contrast with kidney-alone transplantation and suggest that classical HLA mismatch effects may be attenuated in the contemporary SPK setting. Prioritising HLA-based matching, including HLA-DR, is therefore unlikely to improve short- or medium-term post-transplant outcomes in first-time SPK transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.