Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42638149›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2026

Associations between organizational readiness and implementation fidelity in national implementation of WHO's labour care guide in Sweden: a prospective observational study.

Johanna Sjöberg, Anna Ramö Isgren, Thomas Abrahamsson, Marie Blomberg, Kristin Thomas

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05560802 (Can the Use of a Next Generation Partograph Based on WHO's Latest Intrapartum Care Recommendations Improve Neonatal Outcomes? a Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05560802 narecruitingnot on this map

Can the Use of a Next Generation Partograph Based on WHO's Latest Intrapartum Care Recommendations Improve Neonatal Outcomes? a Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Trial (PICRINO)

TypeinterventionalSponsorLinkoeping UniversityRan2023 to 2027Enrolled120,000ConditionsNeonatal Complication, Labor (Obstetrics)--ComplicationsArmsWHOs Labour care guide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johanna SjöbergDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Anna Ramö IsgrenDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Thomas AbrahamssonDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Marie BlombergDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Kristin ThomasDepartment of Medicine, Health and Caring, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. kristin.thomas@liu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring 2024 and 2025, an adapted version of the World Health Organization's Labour Care Guide was implemented in approximately half of Sweden's labor wards within the PICRINO trial. Organizational readiness is widely regarded as a key determinant of successful implementation, however, empirical evidence linking organizational readiness to implementation outcomes remain limited. This study aimed to examine the association between organizational readiness for implementing the Labour Care Guide in Sweden and implementation fidelity, to explore variations in readiness and fidelity across organizational and individual factors and to assess changes in fidelity over time.

methodsThe study included the implementation of the Labour Care Guide at ten labor wards in Sweden. Organizational readiness was measured among health care staff (n = 282) using the E-Ready 2.0 questionnaire before implementation was launched. Fidelity was assessed by analyzing degree of documentation within the Labour Care Guide tool at 3, 6, and 9 months (n = 750). A coding protocol including all seven sections of the tool, in which two sections were considered core components, was used to systematically analyze fidelity. Fidelity was then compared between wards with the aggregated highest, intermediate, and lowest levels of readiness at ward level.

resultsThe three wards reporting the aggregated highest levels of organizational readiness also demonstrated the highest implementation fidelity, while the three wards with the lowest reported aggregated readiness showed the lowest fidelity. In addition, staff at smaller labor wards reported greater readiness than staff at larger wards, and readiness was higher in non-university hospitals compared with university hospitals. Physicians reported higher readiness than midwives. Overall fidelity to the Labour Care Guide declined over time, however, this trend was not observed among core components.

conclusionsThis study provides empirical support for an association between organizational readiness and implementation fidelity when introducing the Labour Care Guide in Sweden. Fidelity to core components remained stable, suggesting that essential elements were more resilient to implementation challenges. Findings highlight the importance of assessing and strengthening organizational readiness prior to implementation and of providing sustained support over time to maintain fidelity, particularly for non-core components.

trial registrationwww. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT05560802, 2022-09-17.

Indexed as

FidelityImplementationLCGLCG-SEOrganizational readiness

Identifiers

PMID42638149
PMCPMC13501707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.