ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Understanding clinical features, predictors of late presentation, and caregiver perspectives and awareness of strabismus in children: a cross-sectional study in a sub-Saharan African setting.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildhood strabismus is a common eye disorder with visual and psychosocial implications. Late presentation remains frequent, influenced by clinical and demographic factors, as well as caregiver knowledge, awareness, and perceptions in sub-Saharan Africa. This study sought to analyze the clinical features, predictors of late presentation, and caregiver perspectives and awareness of strabismus among children attending the Eye Department at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital. MATERIALS AND
methodsA hospital-based analytical cross-sectional study was conducted on 282 children aged 3-15 years. Data on the demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants were analyzed using SPSS Version 20. The chi-square test was used to examine the associations between late presentation and demographic and clinical features. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the predictors of late presentation of strabismus, with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) calculated. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
resultsThe study included 282 children with strabismus, with a mean age at onset of 4.0 ± 1.2 years and a mean age at presentation of 10.1 ± 9.4 years. The majority (148/282, 54.5%) were males. There was a predominance of a left eye deviation (166/282, 58.9%); esotropia predominated (204/282, 72.3%), with 50% inward deviation, 83.3% constant deviation, and 85.5% equal vision in both eyes. 83% of patients presented late. Predictors of late presentation were: having no knowledge about strabismus (p = 0.01, OR = 2.6, CI: 1.3-5.5), low parental education (p = 0.013, OR = 2.3, CI: 1.2-4.4), and having no relative with strabismus (p = 0.003, OR = 3.7, CI: 1.5-8.6). Most parents (189/282, 67.30%) were aware of strabismus, with hospitals being the main source of information (87/189, 46.0%). While 133/282 (47.2%) believed that it was treatable, 149/282 (52.8%) held misperceptions.
conclusionsEsotropia was the most common type of strabismus, with left eye deviation being the most prevalent. Having no knowledge about strabismus, low parental education, and having no relative with strabismus predicted late presentation. Even with caregiver awareness, misperceptions persisted, highlighting the need to strengthen public education and early intervention strategies. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.