ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Co-design of the Implementation Toolkit for Small and Sick Newborn Care: a global open-access knowledge management web platform and linked community targeting the know-do gap.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost births worldwide (> 80%) occur in health care facilities, yet 2.3 million newborns die annually. If the know-do gap between evidence and implementation was closed, an estimated 752,000 newborn deaths could be prevented per year. We describe the co-design of the Implementation Toolkit (Newborn Toolkit) for Small and Sick Newborn Care (SSNC), a web platform and linked community of global implementers, facilitated by NEST360 and UNICEF to enable access to curated resources, including guidelines, practical tools and peer learning for contextual adaptation.
methodsA systematic three step co-design process was followed. Step 1) Structure: We used an organising framework of WHO and UNICEF ten core components for systems strengthening for SSNC. We then reviewed relevant knowledge management platforms to identify elements facilitating user engagement. Step 2) Content: > 300 implementers collated publications and tools according to the ten core components. Step 3) Refining and building community: User data analytics plus direct feedback from the global communities of practice provided data to improve website content and community uptake, notably regular webinars.
resultsStep 1) Structure: In 2020, the Newborn Toolkit website structure was co-designed based on the ten core components. Step 2) Content: Working groups, organised by core components, collated over 1,100 resources in 15 languages. Step 3) Refining and building community: Cross-country learning was facilitated through 45 webinars with multi-disciplinary speakers from all continents including caregivers, clinicians, non-governmental organisation representatives, engineers, and data scientists. French language translation and engagement was added between 2023-2025. Unique user counts increased with 28,146 in 2023 to 62,561 in 2025 from 198 countries and territories. The most viewed content includes WHO guidelines, neonatal floor plans, the ABC device costing tool, and data tools.
conclusionsGiven the urgency for accelerated progress for newborn survival by 2030, faster implementation of proven solutions is needed. It is crucial that implementers can access evidence and tools to adapt for their specific context, rather than "reinventing the wheel". Systems change is complex, requiring novel approaches to make it doable, such as standard, simplified action pathways available on the Newborn Toolkit. Gaps to address include evidence availability in multiple languages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.