ArticleBMC primary care2026
Sleep quality and anxiety among final-year medical interns during a family medicine clerkship: a cross-sectional study with implications for primary care training.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSleep problems and anxiety are common but often under-recognised concerns in primary care. Final-year medical interns, who are medical students undertaking their final year of supervised clinical training, represent an important group for sleep health research because they face clinical responsibilities and concerns related to night shifts, emergency department work, direct patient care, and career-related stressors. This study aimed to evaluate sleep quality and its association with anxiety among medical interns during a Family Medicine clerkship.
methodsThis single-centre cross-sectional study was conducted at Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Faculty of Medicine between June 2023 and September 2023. Data were collected from medical interns during their Family Medicine clerkship. Participants with previously diagnosed psychiatric disorders or sleep disorders were excluded. Face-to-face questionnaires were used, including a sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics form, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the Beck Anxiety Inventory. Descriptive statistics, comparative analyses, correlation analysis, and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to evaluate factors associated with poor sleep quality.
resultsA total of 219 medical interns were included. Poor sleep quality was identified in 59.4% of participants. The mean Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score was 6.59 ± 3.36, the mean sleep duration was 6.73 h, and the mean Beck Anxiety Inventory score was 9.63 ± 8.45. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Beck Anxiety Inventory scores were positively correlated (r = 0.320, p < 0.001). In the multivariable logistic regression model, higher BAI scores, sex, and self-reported concern about taking night shifts were associated with poor sleep quality. Each one-point increase in the BAI score was associated with higher odds of poor sleep quality (odds ratio [OR] = 1.075; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.021-1.131; p = 0.006), while self-reported concern about taking night shifts was associated with 2.48-fold higher odds (OR = 2.483; 95% CI: 1.160-5.317; p = 0.019). Female sex was associated with lower odds of poor sleep quality compared with male sex (OR = 0.513; 95% CI: 0.265-0.994; p = 0.048); however, this finding was less robust in sensitivity analyses and should be considered exploratory.
conclusionPoor sleep quality was common among medical interns and was associated with higher anxiety symptoms and self-reported concern about taking night shifts. These findings support consideration of sleep health and anxiety-related concerns within Family Medicine training. However, the cross-sectional design does not permit causal inference, and intervention studies are needed to determine whether educational, screening, or supportive approaches improve interns' well-being or future clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.