Trial reportInternational journal of implant dentistry2026
Prefabricated CAD/CAM zirconia membrane versus contour augmentation with early implant placement in the anterior maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in International journal of implant dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06987149 (Prefabricated CAD/CAM Zirconia Membrane Versus Contour Augmentation Simultaneously With Dental Implant Placement in the Anterior Esthetic Area.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prefabricated CAD/CAM Zirconia Membrane Versus Contour Augmentation Simultaneously With Dental Implant Placement in the Anterior Esthetic Area.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHorizontal ridge deficiencies in the anterior maxilla frequently compromise ideal implant positioning and esthetic outcomes. This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the clinical performance of customized CAD/CAM zirconia membranes compared with conventional collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration (GBR) performed simultaneously with early implant placement.
methodsTwenty systemically healthy patients requiring single-tooth replacement in the anterior maxilla underwent early implant placement (4-8 weeks after tooth extraction) combined with simultaneous contour augmentation using a composite graft of autogenous bone and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (1:1). Participants were randomly assigned to receive either a customized CAD/CAM zirconia membrane (test group, n = 10) or a double-layer collagen membrane (control group, n = 10). The primary outcome was horizontal bone gain (HBG) at 6 months, assessed by standardized CBCT superimposition. Secondary outcomes included soft tissue healing evaluated using the Modified Wound Healing Index (MWHI), membrane exposure (wound dehiscence), and patient-reported postoperative pain assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS).
resultsAll implants survived during the 6-month follow-up period (100% survival rate). Mean HBG was 6.18 ± 0.60 mm in the test group and 5.85 ± 0.37 mm in the control group, with no statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.158). Membrane exposure occurred in all patients receiving customized zirconia membranes (10/10, 100%), whereas no membrane exposure was observed in the collagen membrane group (0/10, 0%). Despite the higher exposure rate, graft stability and horizontal bone regeneration were not adversely affected. Soft tissue healing was significantly more favorable in the collagen membrane group. Postoperative pain decreased significantly over time in both groups, with no significant intergroup differences.
conclusionsCustomized CAD/CAM zirconia membranes achieved horizontal bone augmentation comparable to conventional collagen membranes when used for simultaneous GBR during early implant placement. Although customized zirconia membranes were associated with a substantially higher membrane exposure rate, regenerative outcomes and implant survival remained unaffected, indicating that customized rigid barriers may represent a predictable alternative for horizontal ridge augmentation while offering potential advantages in surgical precision and procedural efficiency.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06987149.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.