Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42637988›Full record

ReviewArchives of sexual behavior2026

Why Sexual Choking Is Not as Safe as You Think: A Call to Action from Sex Researchers and Kink Educators.

Stephen E Ratcliff, Susan Wright, Debby Herbenick, Aidan A Sunassee, Kiana Cummings, Tess Zachary, Anna Randall, Russell Stambaugh, Gael Strack, Doug D Brown and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stephen E RatcliffThe Alternative Sexualities Health Research Alliance, Rio Vista, CA, USA. steve.ratcliff@tashra.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8535-4440
Susan WrightNational Coalition for Sexual Freedom, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9290-6242
Debby HerbenickCenter for Sexual Health Promotion, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0352-2248
Aidan A SunasseeThe Alternative Sexualities Health Research Alliance, Rio Vista, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4521-1230
Kiana CummingsThe Alternative Sexualities Health Research Alliance, Rio Vista, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5194-7574
Tess ZacharyNational Coalition for Sexual Freedom, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Anna RandallThe Alternative Sexualities Health Research Alliance, Rio Vista, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1423-1711
Russell StambaughNational Coalition for Sexual Freedom, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Gael StrackTraining Institute on Strangulation Prevention, San Diego, CA, USA.
Doug D BrownNational Coalition for Sexual Freedom, Baltimore, MD, USA.
K Tony Korol-EvansNational Coalition for Sexual Freedom, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a synthesis of the research area and issues involving sexual choking, followed by calls to action based on the synthesis. We describe the health risks associated with sexual choking, which is often performed as a form of strangulation, along with its growing popularity in at least the Australia, Iceland, Italy, New Zealand, United Kingdom, and United States. Beginning with a clarification of the often-obfuscated terminology, this paper describes various ways that people are exposed to the practice of sexual choking. Our team identified social media, online pornography, and other popular media as potential drivers of the higher numbers of people reporting engaging in sexual choking compared to older studies. However, there are significant problems with consent and legal issues, including cases where consensual adult choking involving injury or death have resulted in criminal or civil charges in the U.S. This group of researchers, educators, and health experts offers calls to action in specific steps: (1) Widespread education about sexual choking and its risks; (2) Empowering critical evaluation through media and pornography literacy; (3) Organizational engagement in increasing risk awareness; (4) Health education curriculum development; (5) Healthcare provider continuing education; (6) Funding research that addresses sexual choking topics. The goal of this paper is to synthesize the research on this concerning trend in a manner accessible to a diverse array of audiences, and to offer calls to action to address this public health issue for researchers, educators, clinicians, students, kink/BDSM community members, and mainstream persons alike.

Indexed as

Airway ObstructionSexual BehaviorEroticaHealth EducationHumansBDSM/kinkChokingConsentNon-fatal strangulationRough sex

Identifiers

PMID42637988
PMCPMC13597642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.