ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2026
Comparing and Optimizing Tissue Clearing Protocols for Cochlear Immunostaining and 3D Reconstruction by Light-Sheet Microscopy.
Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCurrent standard methods for immunohistochemical analysis of the inner ear rely on cryosectioning of the intact cochlea or dissection of the organ of Corti. Cryosections provide only limited structural information and do not allow quantification of hair cell numbers per basilar membrane length, whereas dissections require substantial technical expertise and often result in damage to the basal cochlear turns. Tissue clearing has largely overcome these limitations and has been widely applied to organs such as the brain, heart, liver, and kidney. However, despite several reports describing cochlear clearing, a systematic comparison of diverse methods is lacking.
methodsHere, we present a comparative evaluation of five established clearing protocols applied to the mouse cochlea, including three organic solvent-based (applied to n = 10 cochleae each) and two aqueous-based approaches (n = 4/8).
resultsAmong these, iDISCO/cDISCO (i/cDISCO) and ethyl cinnamate (ECi) provided superior tissue transparency, morphological preservation, and immunofluorescence staining quality. In contrast, PEGASOS resulted in reduced transparency and occasional wave-like distortion of hair cell rows, probably due to uneven tissue shrinkage. ScaleS and FRUIT exhibited limited clearing performance and variable staining results. Based on these findings, we optimized the two best-performing protocols to enable cochlear clearing within only five days, using inexpensive and minimally toxic reagents.
conclusionThe resulting fastDISCO and fastECi protocols achieved clearing and immunolabeling quality comparable to their full-length counterparts while preserving tissue morphology (applied to n = 17/20 cochleae). These rapid clearing protocols support reproducible 3D light-sheet microscopy of immunostained cochleae and enable automated cell segmentation and quantitative analysis of distinct cell types, including the inner and outer hair cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42637985What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.