ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Outcomes of emergent hiatal hernia repair: does specialty matter?
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHiatal hernia repair is a common procedure performed by both general and thoracic surgeons. While prior studies have shown that emergent hiatal hernia repairs are associated with worse outcomes than elective cases, differences in outcomes by surgical specialty for emergent repairs have not been well-described.
methodsThe American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for patients undergoing hiatal hernia repair from 2012 to 2024. Patients undergoing elective repair and non-primary repairs were excluded. Perioperative outcomes were compared between patients with procedures performed by general and thoracic surgeons. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate differences in outcomes after adjustment for demographics, comorbidities, and preoperative risk factors.
resultsA total of 2,629 patients were identified, including 2,443 (92.9%) performed by general surgery and 186 (7.1%) performed by thoracic surgery. The majority of cases were performed laparoscopically (74.9%) with no mesh placement (70%). On unadjusted analysis, perioperative outcomes were similar between groups. After multivariable adjustment, surgical specialty was not independently associated with 30-day mortality (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.26-1.73), readmission (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.45-1.44), reoperation (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.89-3.04), overall morbidity (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.79-1.70), and length of stay (β = 0.15 days, 95% CI -1.05 to 1.36).
conclusionsAmong patients undergoing emergent hiatal hernia repair, there were no significant differences in short-term outcomes between general and thoracic surgeons after multivariable adjustment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42637950What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.