ArticleNature human behaviour2026
Trial-by-trial fluctuations in decision criterion shape confidence.
Article in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many decisions are accompanied by confidence. One influential view couched within signal detection theory views confidence as the distance between a decision variable and a static decision criterion. However, recent work suggests that the criterion undergoes trial-by-trial fluctuations. Here, combining theory and model simulations, we predict that fluctuations in the decision criterion shape confidence. In 15 datasets, trial-by-trial estimates of the decision criterion were obtained with the hierarchical model for fluctuations in criterion. Across datasets, we confirmed our pre-registered hypothesis that confidence is shaped by a single-trial criterion state. This effect was found in 14 out of 15 datasets, indicating a robust pattern across a variety of paradigms and confidence scales. Beyond self-reports, the effect was also observed in reaction times, pupil-linked arousal and a neural signature of confidence. Our results show that variability in confidence, often treated as noise, actually reflects genuine sensitivity to the current state of the (fluctuating) decision criterion.
Identifiers
42637913What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.