ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
Impact of an Asynchronous E-learning Intervention on Cancer Knowledge and Clinical Practice for Pre-registration Nursing and Allied Health Professions Students and Cancer Support Workers.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pre-registration nursing and allied health professions students and cancer support workers can feel unprepared to care for people affected by cancer and at the end of life. To address this need, nine e-learning modules, collectively called 'Foundations of Cancer Care', have been developed aligned to the NHS England ACCEND Framework. The resultant programme is freely available to anyone with a UK email address via the NHS Learning Hub. To evaluate accessibility, structure, relevance, design and style of this nationwide digital education programme, and to understand the impact of the porgramme on cancer specific knowledge and clinical practice, an e-survey was developed based on the Kirkpatrick model of evaluation. On completing the programme, participants were invited to participate in the survey. Anonymised data were collated via the NHS Learning Hub and analysed using descriptive statistics. There was a mean of 343 distinct users per module and 123 participated in the evaluation. Most participants were student nurses (n=42, 33.9%) or support workers (n=35, 28.6%). In total, 88.6% (n=109) of participants rated the overall programme as good/very good. Over 90% agreed/strongly agreed that they had improved their knowledge and understanding of the impact of cancer on individuals, families and society (n=111). When asked how likely they would be to recommend the programme to their peers on a scale of 0-10 where 0 = not at all and 10 = extremely likely, 86.7% (n=105) rated a 5 or higher and 32.2% (n=39) rated 10 (extremely likely). Almost all thought the programme would help them with their role (n=111, 91.0%) and 89.4% (n=110) reported they would be able to use what they have learned in their clinical practice. This demonstrates that a digital education programme can increase knowledge and understanding of cancer care and is acceptable to users and their learning can be used in clinical practice. It is important to embed this digital intervention in pre-registration healthcare programmes and training and development opportunities for support workers providing care to people affected by cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42637904What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.