Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42637881›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2026

Cancer and Health Inequalities.

Donna Wakefield, Clare Bambra

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Donna WakefieldPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Donna.wakefield1@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6811-1255
Clare BambraPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

DH | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) NIHR200173DH | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) NIHR204291DH | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) NIHR303241DH | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) PR-PRU-1217-2050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is subject to stark inequalities, with mortality rates 60% higher in the most deprived parts of the UK. Most research has focused on the role of behavioural risk factors or access to health care services. Insufficient attention has been paid to the influence of socio-economic factors across the whole cancer continuum. This essay argues that to reduce cancer inequalities and improve patient experience and clinical outcomes, we need to look more widely at inequalities in: (1) the risk of developing cancer; (2) the effectiveness of prevention, detection and diagnosis; (3) treatment; (4) survivorship, and (5) access to palliative care. We argue that a stronger awareness and understanding of the influence of the wider social, economic and cultural context of health can enable clinicians to improve the delivery of more equitable cancer care. We conclude by recommending ways forward to improve the cancer continuum for everyone.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.