ArticleScientific reports2026
Sex differences in parietal lobe activation among orienteering athletes during a mental rotation task using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study used fNIRS to examine sex differences in spatial cognition and brain function in orienteering athletes during mental rotation. Forty-two athletes performed a letter-based mental rotation task while fNIRS data were recorded. After quality control, 33 participants were included. Behavioral performance, brain activation, and brain-behavior relationships were analyzed using t-tests, correlations, and ANCOVA, with FDR correction for multiple comparisons. Males showed higher accuracy than females (83.33% vs. 69.68%, p = 0.039, d = 0.91), but reaction time did not differ (p = 0.228). No significant brain activation differences were found after FDR correction, though a marginal trend was observed in the IPL region for HbT (q = 0.074, d = -0.91), with males showing lower activation. Sex-specific correlations were found: BA5 HbR correlated with reaction time in females (r = 0.547), and IPL HbR correlated with reaction time in males (r = 0.458). Females showed greater inter-individual variability. Male behavioral advantages were directionally consistent with lower parietal activation, aligning with the neural efficiency hypothesis. Sex-specific relationships and greater female variability suggest strategic heterogeneity. This study provides preliminary fNIRS evidence for sex differences in mental rotation among orienteering athletes, with conclusions restricted to this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.