Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42637855›Full record

ReviewAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Community Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery: A Proposal.

Theddeus O H Prasetyono

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Theddeus O H PrasetyonoDivision of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Universitas Indonesia/ Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jl. Diponegoro 71 Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia. theddeus.h@ui.ac.id.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3675-4309

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery (PRAS) faces domain erosion from adjacent specialties and jurisdictional competition. To maintain clinical authority and address modern healthcare complexities, PRAS must evolve beyond an organ-specific, micro-scale procedural focus toward an interdisciplinary paradigm that integrates medical sciences, ethics, cultural, medicolegal frameworks and socio-economic frameworks.

objectiveTo propose Community Plastic Surgery as a formalized, population-oriented interdisciplinary subspecialty within PRAS that shifts practice from individual pathology management to a macro-scale, holistic model of societal health. PROPOSED

methodsA conceptual framework was developed by synthesizing current interdisciplinary models in PRAS (e.g., hand surgery, craniofacial surgery, oncoplastic surgery) and incorporating socio-cultural, ethics and medicolegal, economic, and managerial frameworks. The subspecialty's implementation was structured into four interconnected domains supported by Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM), Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), and Artificial Intelligence (AI): clinical practice, education and training, research and innovation, and policy and community engagement. POPULATION ORIENTED PRAS: Community Plastic Surgery bridges clinical practice with public health through accredited educational and training modules. The framework formalizes charitable surgical initiatives, optimizes equitable care accessibility, incorporates cultural competency in both reconstructive and aesthetic domains, and establishes rigorous standards for outcome assessment and socio-medical research. PARADIGM OF SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: Establishing Community Plastic Surgery represents a vital paradigm shift toward social responsibility and stewardship in PRAS. By institutionalizing this interdisciplinary subspecialty through standardized accreditation, PRAS expands its clinical relevance and ensures a sustainable, humanistically grounded future in global healthcare. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Delivery of health careMedicineScienceSpecializationSurgery, plastic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.