Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42637847›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Differences in clinical presentation and treatment decisions between frail and not-frail head and neck cancer patients.

Eoin F Cleere, Justin M Hintze, Gerard Sexton, James Griffin, Conrad V I Timon, John Kinsella, Paul Lennon, Conall W R Fitzgerald

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eoin F CleereDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. eoincleere@rcsi.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2750-3057
Justin M HintzeDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Gerard SextonDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
James GriffinDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Conrad V I TimonDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
John KinsellaDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Paul LennonDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Conall W R FitzgeraldDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study evaluated if patient presentation, treatment decisions and oncologic outcomes were different among frail vs. not-frail patients presenting with a new head and neck cancer.

methodsA single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted including consecutive patients presenting with a new mucosal head and neck SCC over a 1-year period. Frailty was calculated using the 5 item modified frailty index (5mFI).

resultsTwo-hundred and thirty-two patients were included with 61 patients (26.3%) being frail using the 5mFI. Frail patients were older (70.6 years vs. 61.9 years; p < 0.001) and more likely to present with T3/4 disease (65.7% vs. 49.1%; p = 0.027). Frail patients were more likely to receive palliative intent treatment (16.4% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.003). Among patients managed with curative intent, there were differences in treatments received (p = 0.022). Three-year overall survival (OS) (76.7% vs.49.7%; p < 0.001) and 3-year disease free survival (DFS) (71.1% vs. 38.9%; p < 0.001) was significantly reduced among frail patients.

conclusionOver one-quarter of patients with new mucosal SCCs were frail. Frail patients presented with more advanced primary tumours. Frailty was associated with significantly worse 3-year OS and DFS and was associated with differences in treatment intent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

5-item modified frail indexDecision makingFrailtyHead and neckSquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.