ReviewNature protocols2026
Selective heavy-metal sequestration and rare-earth element recovery using metal-organic frameworks.
Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modern water treatment and resource recovery demand materials that combine high performance with real-world durability. Traditional remediation approaches (e.g., precipitation and coagulation) have drawbacks (e.g., poor selectivity) that can be overcome using adsorption-based strategies. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) offer high tunability, high uptake capacities and the potential for regeneration. Translating MOF adsorbents into scalable, reliable technologies requires consistent method reporting and improved mechanistic insight, toward improving long-term stability in realistic water matrices. In this protocol, we describe how to deploy and assess the performance of MOF-based adsorbents for simultaneous heavy-metal sequestration (e.g., Pb(II), Cd(II), Ni(II) and Mn(II)) and rare-earth element recovery (e.g., Nd(III), Y(III) and Dy(III)) from complex water matrices. The workflow is broadly applicable across MOF chemistries and is illustrated using Cu(II)-based frameworks as representative model systems, synthesized at gram scale using commercially available precursors. We stabilize these frameworks through controlled defect engineering (e.g., partial metal substitution) to mitigate hydrolytic degradation and prolong operation time. We further tune morphology (e.g., nanosheets) to enhance surface accessibility and enable recyclability. For industrial applicability, we shape the MOFs into macrobeads via a green process. The procedure comprises: (i) MOF synthesis; (ii) comprehensive pre-adsorption characterization to assess crystallinity, porosity, morphology and composition using powder X-ray diffraction, nitrogen adsorption-desorption, scanning electron microscopy and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry; (iii) mechanistic adsorption assessment with kinetic, isotherm, thermodynamic, pH and selectivity analyses; (iv) regeneration and recovery workflows; and (v) deployment considerations in complex aqueous matrices, including industrial effluents, saline waters and e-waste leachates. The protocol provides a reproducible framework for implementing MOF-based adsorption technologies in water remediation and circular resource applications.
Identifiers
42637844What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.