Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42637824›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Dynamic F1-score-based voting strategies for multi-class classification: an adaptive ensemble approach for non-linear and imbalanced datasets.

Amr M Hamed, Abdel-Fattah Attia, Heba El-Behery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amr M HamedDepartment of Computer Engineering and Systems, Faculty of Engineering, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.
Abdel-Fattah AttiaDepartment of Computer Engineering and Systems, Faculty of Engineering, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.
Heba El-BeheryDepartment of Computer Engineering and Systems, Faculty of Engineering, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt. eng_heba_2010@eng.kfs.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classification is a core machine learning task, and ensemble voting methods are widely used to improve predictive accuracy in domains such as medical diagnosis, where class imbalance and non-linear decision boundaries are common. Conventional strategies: Majority Voting (MV), Weighted Voting (WV), and Soft Voting (SV) rely on static or classifier-level weighting schemes that fail to capture per-class differences in classifier reliability. Three dynamic, class-specific voting strategies are introduced: Highest Class F1-Score Voting (HCF1V), Cumulative Class F1-Score Voting (CCF1V), and Enhanced Class F1-Score Voting (ECF1V), each assigning classifier weights based on per-class F1-scores obtained during validation rather than overall performance. The strategies were evaluated through computational simulation on three synthetic non-linear datasets (Gaussian Mixture, Spiral, and Moon) and two real-world medical benchmarks-the Breast Cancer Wisconsin Dataset (BCWD) and the UCI Heart Disease Dataset (UHDD)-using scikit-learn-based classifiers, with statistical significance assessed via Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. ECF1V achieved the highest accuracy across most settings, reaching 98.25% on BCWD and 89.47% on UHDD, outperforming both conventional voting methods and several recently published approaches. These results indicate that class-specific F1-score-based weighting improves ensemble reliability, particularly under class imbalance, supporting its applicability to high-stakes classification tasks such as medical diagnosis.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsClassification AlgorithmsComputer SimulationEnsemble LearningFemaleHeart DiseasesHumansNonlinear DynamicsReproducibility of ResultsVotingBreast Cancer DetectionDynamic VotingEnsemble LearningF1-Score-Based WeightingHeart Disease PredictionMedical DiagnosisMulti-Class ClassificationSoft Voting

Identifiers

PMID42637824
PMCPMC13503866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.