ArticleScientific reports2026
Dynamic F1-score-based voting strategies for multi-class classification: an adaptive ensemble approach for non-linear and imbalanced datasets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Classification is a core machine learning task, and ensemble voting methods are widely used to improve predictive accuracy in domains such as medical diagnosis, where class imbalance and non-linear decision boundaries are common. Conventional strategies: Majority Voting (MV), Weighted Voting (WV), and Soft Voting (SV) rely on static or classifier-level weighting schemes that fail to capture per-class differences in classifier reliability. Three dynamic, class-specific voting strategies are introduced: Highest Class F1-Score Voting (HCF1V), Cumulative Class F1-Score Voting (CCF1V), and Enhanced Class F1-Score Voting (ECF1V), each assigning classifier weights based on per-class F1-scores obtained during validation rather than overall performance. The strategies were evaluated through computational simulation on three synthetic non-linear datasets (Gaussian Mixture, Spiral, and Moon) and two real-world medical benchmarks-the Breast Cancer Wisconsin Dataset (BCWD) and the UCI Heart Disease Dataset (UHDD)-using scikit-learn-based classifiers, with statistical significance assessed via Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. ECF1V achieved the highest accuracy across most settings, reaching 98.25% on BCWD and 89.47% on UHDD, outperforming both conventional voting methods and several recently published approaches. These results indicate that class-specific F1-score-based weighting improves ensemble reliability, particularly under class imbalance, supporting its applicability to high-stakes classification tasks such as medical diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.