ArticleScientific reports2026
Clinical-radiomic model development for local recurrence prediction in stereotactic body radiation therapy-treated lung cancer: comparative analysis with radiobiological models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of local recurrence (LR) after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung cancer remains challenging, and conventional radiobiological models have shown limited predictive performance. This study aimed to develop a clinical-radiomic model for LR prediction and compare its performance with existing radiobiological models. A total of 153 SBRT-treated lung cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed. Radiobiological models were used to estimate 2-year and 3-year local control (LC) probabilities, which were subsequently converted to LR probabilities using the relationship P(LR) = 1 - P(LC) for comparison with other models. Radiomic feature selection and model construction were performed using LASSO regression with tenfold cross-validation. A clinical-radiomic model was built by integrating clinical factors with the radiomic score (Radscore), followed by nomogram development. Model performance was evaluated using ROC analysis and calibration plots, with internal validation performed through bootstrap resampling. Clinical utility was evaluated using bootstrapped ROC, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The clinical-radiomic model showed higher AUC values than the radiobiological and radiomic models alone for both 2-year and 3-year LR predictions (all P < 0.05). Nomogram-derived risk scores differed significantly between the recurrence and non-recurrence groups. Bootstrap resampling suggested stable discriminatory performance, acceptable calibration, and potential decision-analytic performance. The clinical-radiomic model may show potential for individualized LR risk stratification in lung cancer patients receiving SBRT. However, further external validation in prospective multicenter studies is required before routine clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.