ArticleScientific reports2026
Hybrid computational intelligence framework for accurate wind power forecasting and grid integration applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate wind power forecasting is essential for the reliable operation and large-scale integration of renewable energy into modern power grids. This study develops and systematically evaluates a hybrid computational intelligence framework that integrates advanced machine learning models with nature-inspired optimization algorithms for wind power prediction. CatBoost (CAT), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) models were optimized using Cuckoo Search Optimization (CSO) and the Stochastic Paint Optimizer (SPO) to determine the most effective model-optimizer configuration under variable wind conditions. A comparative analysis demonstrates that the CAT-SPO hybrid model achieved the best predictive performance, yielding a test RMSE of 0.0338 and an R² of 0.984, outperforming alternative configurations. Feature relevance analysis and multicollinearity assessment using the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) identified hub-height wind speed (100 m) as the dominant predictor (32.5% relative importance; VIF ≈ 3.96), while lower-height wind speed (10 m) was excluded due to high collinearity. Wind gust measurements at 10 m retained substantial explanatory contribution (≈ 19.2% importance; VIF ≈ 4.34), highlighting the role of short-term atmospheric variability in power modeling. The proposed framework enhances forecasting reliability and supports improved grid stability, reserve allocation, renewable energy integration, and data-driven operational planning. These findings advance intelligent energy management systems and sustainable power grid engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.