ArticleScientific reports2026
Clinical validation pipeline of a deep learning model for segmenting and quantifying intracranial and ventricular volumes on computed tomography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of radiology is experiencing a surge in demand due to advances in medical imaging, particularly in techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography (CT). However, the interpretation of these scans relies heavily on the availability of experts, which is challenging in resource-limited regions. Recent advances in artificial intelligence and deep learning offer promising solutions by assisting radiologists in image interpretation and diagnosis. This study focuses on validating DeepCTE3D (Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Computed Tomography Extraction 3D), a deep learning-based model based on 3D architecture for segmenting and quantifying intracranial volume (ICV) and lateral ventricular volume (LVV) in CT scans. The model's performance was evaluated using a real-world dataset comprising diverse patient demographics and various scanner models, including normal and pathological scans. The evaluation process involved developing a streamlined pipeline to generate ground-truth results and comparing them to the model's outputs. DeepCTE3D achieved high similarity scores for both ICV and LVV. Secondary analyses revealed differences in LVV and ICV between patient sexes and scanner models, although these differences were not clinically significant. This study highlights the potential of DeepCTE3D in enhancing clinical triage and advancing neuroimaging applications, especially in scenarios where MRI is not feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.