ArticleNature communications2026
A multimodal vision-language model for comprehensive dental diagnosis and enhanced clinical practice.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oral diseases affect billions of people, yet specialist dental expertise remains unevenly distributed, and diagnosis often requires synthesis across diverse imaging modalities. Existing artificial intelligence systems mostly address isolated tasks, limiting their applicability in comprehensive dental assessment. Here we introduce DentVLM, a dental vision-language model that jointly interprets images and text, supports expert-level oral disease diagnosis across seven dental imaging modalities and 36 tasks. Developed using 110,447 images and 2.46 million bilingual visual question-answer pairs, DentVLM outperforms leading proprietary, open-source and domain-specific medical models on internal and external tests. In a study of 32 participants, DentVLM surpasses junior readers, matches intermediate general practitioners and approaches senior specialists. In collaborative workflows, it raises junior and intermediate readers toward specialist-level performance and reduces diagnostic time for all readers by 15.0-37.0%. These results establish DentVLM as a clinical decision support tool for reducing specialist care gaps and broadening access to high-quality dental expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.