Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42637559›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026

Beta Oscillations and Pupil-Linked Arousal Regulate the Updating of Cognitive Models.

Charlotte R Marshall, Mengxi Wang, Emma L Lawrance, Nils Kolling, Jill X O'Reilly

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charlotte R MarshallDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3EL, United Kingdom.
Mengxi WangDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3EL, United Kingdom.
Emma L LawranceDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3EL, United Kingdom.
Nils KollingDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3EL, United Kingdom.
Jill X O'ReillyDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3EL, United Kingdom jill.oreilly@psy.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The beta rhythm (neural oscillations in the range 13-30 Hz) is associated with the control of movement. Discrete movements (such as a button press) are bounded by a premovement dip in beta power and a postmovement beta rebound, which are thought to release and terminate the action, respectively. However, an additional or alternative role has been suggested for the beta rebound in regulating the extent to which sensory feedback updates the task model. Using EEG and pupillometry in human volunteers of both sexes, we developed a task that dissociates updating of a cognitive model from motor control. We found that beta oscillations were modulated in two independent modes-phasic and tonic-with distinct computational correlates. When abstract task models are updated by integrating the outcomes of several actions, there is a tonic suppression of the beta rhythm, which originates at the time of the postmovement rebound, spans multiple trials, and is measurable at both the pre- and postmovement stages. Independently, phasic trial-to-trial fluctuations in beta power, primarily measurable in the premovement phase, were associated with motor readiness. The decrease in tonic beta power during model updating was mediated by an increase in tonic pupil dilation, a known correlate of model updating often considered a proxy for neuromodulatory tone.

Indexed as

ArousalBeta RhythmCognitionPupilAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceYoung AdultBayesian updatebeta oscillationspupillometryuncertainty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.