Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42637545›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2026

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over Right PMd Does Not Affect the Stability of Rhythmic Bimanual Finger Movements.

Ronan Denyer, Anjana Rajendran, Cristina Rubino, Lara A Boyd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ronan DenyerInstitute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Brussels 1200, Belgium ronan.denyer@uclouvain.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1399-9127
Anjana RajendranGraduate Program in Neuroscience, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T1Z3, Canada.
Cristina RubinoGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T1Z3, Canada.
Lara A BoydDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T1Z3, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How the brain controls rhythmic asymmetric bimanual movements remains an enduring question in neuroscience. Prior research suggests that the right dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) is essential for maintaining asymmetric bimanual rhythmic finger-tapping patterns. However, such findings have not fully accounted for evidence showing that asymmetric movements impose greater cognitive control demands than symmetric ones. Thus, previously observed disruptions following transient disruption of right PMd may reflect impaired cognitive control rather than motor processes specific to asymmetry. To test this, we manipulated cognitive control demands during bimanual tapping by having participants synchronize movements with regularly flickering visual stimuli. Switching from spatially congruent to symbolic cues reduces tapping stability similarly to switching from symmetric to asymmetric patterns, providing a platform to test the cognitive control hypothesis. Right PMd was targeted with 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) intended to transiently reduce excitability. Participants (15 females, 13 males) completed symmetric and asymmetric tapping tasks across multiple frequencies. Performance was compared with a sham session. Contrary to expectations, rTMS-related alterations in tapping stability and accuracy were not dependent on movement symmetry or cognitive control demands. Instead, no detectable behavioral effect of rTMS was observed under the present stimulation and testing conditions. These results indicate that asymmetric rhythmic tapping can be maintained after rTMS over right PMd, although lacking direct measures of PMd target engagement limits conclusions regarding cortical perturbation effectiveness. Future work incorporating concurrent neural measures can determine the mechanisms underlying this null effect.

Indexed as

FingersFunctional LateralityMotor ActivityMotor CortexPsychomotor PerformanceTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMovementPeriodicityPhotic StimulationYoung Adultaction–perception couplingbimanual coordinationdorsal premotor cortexhumanmotor controltranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42637545
PMCPMC13505808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.