Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42637262›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2026

Bone stress injury recovery and return to sport in runners: a multi-site prospective observational cohort study protocol across the USA and Canada.

Kristin L Popp, Elizabeth Whitcomb, Michael E Hahn, Trent Stellingwerff, Robert E Guldberg, Emily Kraus, Mary L Bouxsein, Kathryn E Ackerman

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kristin L PoppTRIA Research and Education Center, HealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA kpopp@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8029-1466
Elizabeth WhitcombTRIA Research and Education Center, HealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8140-0345
Michael E HahnBowerman Sports Science Center, Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Trent StellingwerffCanadian Sport Institute Pacific, Victoria, Australia, Canada.
Robert E GuldbergDepartment of Bioengineering, Phil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact Department of Bioengineering, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Emily KrausDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Mary L BouxseinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7027-7414
Kathryn E AckermanWomen's Health, Sports, and Performance Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBone stress injuries (BSIs) are common overuse injuries in athletes and are associated with prolonged recovery and high rates of reinjury. Despite their clinical importance, there is no consensus on how to define or assess BSI healing. Clinical, functional and imaging outcomes for BSI healing are used inconsistently across studies, limiting comparability and the development of evidence-based return-to-sport guidelines. This study aims to identify and characterise candidate outcomes for assessing BSI healing in runners, including their time course and variability across function, imaging and clinical domains. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a 1 year, multi-site prospective cohort study of male and female runners with a recent MRI-confirmed BSI of the tibia, metatarsals, femoral neck or sacrum. We will enrol participants across four clinical and academic research sites in the USA and Canada, within 3 weeks of diagnostic MRI and follow them longitudinally for 1 year through recovery, return to sport and full sport participation. Candidate outcomes for BSI healing include time to pain-free functional milestones (eg, hopping, jogging), completion of a return-to-run protocol, medical clearance for unrestricted activity, and changes in MRI grade and clinical severity scores. Secondary and exploratory measures include training patterns, wearable-derived activity and sleep metrics, biomechanical assessments, and serum proteomic profiles. We will use descriptive statistics to characterise the time course and variability of candidate outcomes. We will explore associations between outcomes and subsequent BSIs within 1 year using regression models. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received institutional review board approval at all participating institutions. We will obtain written informed consent from all participants prior to any study procedures (and assent with parental consent for minors). We will disseminate results through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conferences.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesCumulative Trauma DisordersFractures, StressReturn to SportRunningAdultCanadaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionResearch DesignUnited StatesExerciseFractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42637262
PMCPMC13504497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.