ArticleBMJ open2026
Equity-focused analysis of tailoring strategies for overcoming risk factors in ethnic minorities (EQUATOR): a protocol for a scoping review with a realist analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChronic diseases driven by modifiable risk factors (MRFs), such as poor diet, physical inactivity, tobacco use and harmful alcohol consumption, disproportionately affect ethnic minority groups worldwide and within multi‑ethnic societies such as Singapore. Although culturally tailored interventions and implementation strategies exist, there is limited synthesis of what has been used, for whom and under which contextual conditions these approaches produce equitable reductions in MRFs. EQUATOR aims to identify and synthesise policies, programmes and implementation strategies that have been tailored for ethnic and cultural minority populations and to develop explanatory mid‑range programme theories describing how, why and under what circumstances such tailoring produces equitable outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a scoping review with a realist synthesis as the analytical approach. Searches will be run in PubMed and Scopus for studies published from January 2010 onwards, restricted to English. Eligible studies include experimental, quasi‑experimental, qualitative, mixed‑methods studies and reviews that evaluate or report outcomes for tailored strategies addressing MRFs in ethnic minority populations and explicitly examine equity‑focused outcomes or mechanisms. A piloted data extraction form will capture study characteristics, contextual details, intervention/strategy descriptions, theoretical underpinnings and outcomes using a RE‑AIM lens (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) and equity indicators. Extracted data will support (1) an inductive typology of strategies/interventions for each MRF and (2) realist S/ICMO (Strategy/Intervention-Context-Mechanism-Outcome) configurations to generate mid‑range programme theories explaining how tailoring works (or fails) across contexts. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this literature synthesis. Findings will be disseminated through peer‑reviewed publications, presentations to policymakers and practitioners and stakeholder briefings to emphasise actionable recommendations for culturally tailored strategies to reduce MRFs and promote health equity in multi‑ethnic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.