SynthesisBMJ open2026
Patients' experiences of mobile health tools for chronic heart failure self-management: a qualitative meta-synthesis.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically synthesise qualitative evidence on the experiences of chronic heart failure (CHF) patients using mobile health (mHealth) tools for self-management and to identify factors influencing their acceptance and adherence, thereby informing the development of more patient-centred solutions.
designQualitative meta-synthesis.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted using terms related to mHealth, heart failure, self-management and qualitative research. Study quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute criteria for qualitative studies, and data were synthesised using thematic synthesis. The search covered the period from database inception to July 2025. DATA SOURCES: The following eight electronic databases were searched: PubMed, Ovid, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wangfang and VIP
resultsA total of 18 studies were included, yielding two integrated themes: factors influencing the use of mHealth tools and recommendations for their development.
conclusionsExperiences of patients with CHF using mHealth underscore the need for a patient-centred paradigm in mHealth design. Codesigning tools based on patients' real-world needs and preferences is crucial to promote sustained engagement and effective self-management. Healthcare professionals and developers should prioritise usability, personalisation and continuous support to enhance acceptance. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420-25638367.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.