Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42637230›Full record

SynthesisClinical psychology & psychotherapy

A Systematic Review of Validated Measures of Supervisory Competence in Psychology and Counselling Practice.

Kerry A Thomas, Craig J Gonsalvez, Chien H Gooi, Christine Carey

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kerry A ThomasSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2980-2384
Craig J GonsalvezSchool of Psychology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3294-6314
Chien H GooiSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1828-6145
Christine CareyNorthfields Psychology Clinic, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9613-9440

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, supervisor competency frameworks have been developed to guide the provision of supervision for trainee psychologists and counsellors, and ongoing clinical supervision in the workplace. A range of instruments have been developed that focus on one or more of these competencies. The aim of this systematic review was to identify psychometrically validated measures of supervisory competence and to review which domains are assessed by each instrument. Three databases were systematically searched, PsycINFO, Scopus and Medline, from 2010 to 2025, to identify sources that met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen sources were included in the review, all of which had a cross-sectional design, and four included a repeated-measures component. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias of these studies, and two reviewers mapped the instruments to the domains they assess. All instruments were evaluated across five criteria: type of rating measure, number of domains assessed, psychometric properties, who completes the instrument and number of instrument formats. All instruments were questionnaire-based; most assessed at least five of 10 relevant domains. The majority were designed for supervisees, with a few having supervisor and supervisee versions, and only two instruments had multiple formats. Internal reliability ranged from moderate to high, and four instruments demonstrated high test-retest reliability. Adequate to good convergent validity was established on most instruments, and adequate to good divergent validity on a few. This review synthesises key aspects of supervisor competency instruments, enabling supervisors, training institutions and clinical practices to select tools most relevant to their settings.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCounselingHumansPsychologistsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairescompetency domainspsychometric assessmentsupervision measuressupervisor competency

Identifiers

PMID42637230
PMCPMC13503039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.