ArticleCell reports. Medicine2026
Cell-free DNA genomic and fragmentomic features for early outcome prediction in large B cell lymphoma.
Article in Cell reports. Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Curative-intent immunochemotherapy fails in ∼30% of patients with large B cell lymphoma (LBCL), yet no validated molecular tool enables early identification of high-risk individuals to guide treatment intensification. Using shallow whole-genome sequencing (sWGS) of plasma cell-free DNA from 190 LBCL patients, we develop and validate the ACT score (aberrations, composition of fragments, and terminal motif analyses), a composite classifier integrating genomic and fragmentomic features from a single post-cycle-1 sample. ACT-positive patients have worse 2-year outcomes versus ACT-negative patients: time-to-progression 29% vs. 83% (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-10.0; p = 1.5 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.